I wish we could start over with some of our back-and-forth
conversations regarding the school bond measure and come at the issue with the
understanding that we all ultimately want what's best for our schools, our
children and our community. Somewhere
along the line, people have said things that show they truly don't understand
that we all have the same goals in mind - that is the well-being of our
children, which includes a good education and good learning environment for
them - AND the well-being of our community.
The problem is that we don't agree on the way and/or the time to
accomplish those goals.
If one is a thoughtful person, each side of this issue should be
understandable to the other side.
Those persons who hope the present school bond measure will pass with a
"yes" vote think that there is no better way to spend money than on
our kids. They think that our children
deserve a better structural environment in which to be educated. They want easier access to classrooms for
special needs children and for visiting adults with movement disabilities. They want more room for children to spread
out for group learning. They want a
large gymnasium for physical education and the sports which our community
values greatly. They want an auditorium
where all kinds of special activities can take place for both school and
community events. Many of these
"yes" people have put a great amount of time and effort into helping plan the new school. Many of them are educators and community members with excellent ideas about how to create a successful learning
environment. In addition, they've called
in experts in architectural and school management fields to help them with
their goals. Their efforts should be appreciated whether or not one agrees with
their outcome.
Those persons who hope the school bond measure will be defeated at this
time want many of the same things that the bond-supporters want. They also love and value the children of our
community and want them to have an excellent education. The disagreement over the bond issue revolves
around the high cost of the proposed school structure and the high property
taxes that will have to be paid for the next 20 years. Many of these "no" people worry about
the community members (the elderly, the disabled, people with low or fixed
incomes) whose lives will be drastically impacted with such a high tax burden
added to what they are already paying.
They also worry about the huge impact on farmers who are already
suffering from our current recession and low commodity prices. They don't think that such a huge, forced
investment "at this time" is such a good idea. Many of these community members (successful
business persons, farmers, persons with low incomes, our older population) wonder why the school district didn't present
them with several different choices/proposals before forcing a vote for a school
bond on them in such a very short period of time . They are concerned that a "yes"
vote at this time will ultimately be detrimental to everyone because of the
negative effect on the livelihood of many of our community taxpayers. The concerns of this group should be
acknowledged and appreciated whether or not one agrees with them.
My question is... can we possibly
work together to come up with a less burdensome plan that will address
the problem issues at Carrington Elementary School - without having to build a
new school? I've heard that during their
meetings the school district came up with a $5-6 million upgrade which they
discarded. Perhaps the Carrington School
District community would gladly approve of this amount instead of the $23.5 to
$35 million dollar tax responsibility that will be forced on them with a
"yes" vote on the present measure.
Is it too late to do something like this? Can we defeat this measure, and then proceed
to accomplish a much less expensive fix?
The Carrington School District community is filled with people who are talented
and knowledgeable in all the areas necessary to accomplish any goal on which
they focus. The key to success is to
WORK TOGETHER and FOCUS on creating an outcome that is BENEFICIAL TO EVERYONE.
No comments:
Post a Comment